(no subject)
Jan. 16th, 2004 02:14 pmRepublicans for Dean
*scratches head* I know Dean is pretty much centrist in many regards, but this is still odd.
(The icon has nothing to do with anything, I just wanted to use it.)
*scratches head* I know Dean is pretty much centrist in many regards, but this is still odd.
(The icon has nothing to do with anything, I just wanted to use it.)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 02:26 pm (UTC)in terms of freakishly wide-spread mass-adoration with little cause, dean sort of reminds me of that antichrist guy from that left behind book series. i mean, the part about charming everyone magically. not being. you know. the devil incarnate.
(although...)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:29 pm (UTC)Dean needs to keep his fucking mouth shut, honestly. Hard-core duct-taping and everything.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:42 pm (UTC)but yeah, he makes a lot of statements like that about other people. it's like politics 101 or something -- yes, pointing out the flaws of other candidates makes you look good in comparison, but that can't be the basis of what you have to say. also, i am just sort of disturbed by the fact that in one of the televised rallies they had in iowa this mob of people started chanting "dean, dean, dean" in unison while he stood on a podium. it looked like something out of Buffy.
also, there is just something orwellian about the way people seem to blindly accept him as "THE democrat", simply because the media is calling him the front-runner. i mean, that's another thing i like about clark -- in all debates, he is very direct about answering questions. dean is like the King of Spin; i know once in particular they asked him a question about his views on giving smokers free health care, and he responded with a full minute about how to balance budgets. -___- but he doesn't give people a very clear idea about his opinions on things, and i don't find the fact he only seems capable of expressing these opinions one his website to be very comforting.
erm. yes. *climbs off soapbox o'dume*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:50 pm (UTC)*sighs* Clark. I really would like him to win, but he's too late jumping in the game and he has no fecking money. If Dean gets the democratic nomination (which is very likely that he will, despite the fact that all of a sudden the media's been like "Dean temper! Dean unlikeable!" for whatever reason), Bush has a much better chance to get re-elected. If Clark goes up against him, the Democrats might, y'know, win.
/soapbox
(Might I get your IM info somehow? I feel the need to be able to randomly wail at you in moments of political despair)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:56 pm (UTC)and you most certainly may! on AIM i'm 'miss super spy', and on YM i am 'painfulbread'.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:34 pm (UTC)"So you believe in universal health care?"
"Yeah, I do."
"And you're Republican?"
"At heart, anyways."
The way political labels in this country function never fail to amuse me.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:24 pm (UTC)However, on Feb 1st, people will be getting together with friends all around the country to watch the big game. My hope is that hundreds of Dean supporters will use this as an opportunity to talk with friends about Howard Dean.
That's freaky, especially the second sentence. Sounds like having a pizza party to spread the word about Jesus Christ. "Have you welcomed Dean into your life?"
Oh well, Jesus is fun, and so is Howard I guess.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-16 03:32 pm (UTC)mantracall to armscampaign slogan is "Dean is the messenger. We are the message." It's creepy the way people gravitate to him without any real idea of what attracts them.